Camelina sativa variety &#34;so-120&#34;

ABSTRACT

The subject invention relates to a  Camelina sativa  (L.) Crantz spring-type seed designated as “SO-120” derived from a cross between  Camelina  accessions with high yield and oil quality attributes following conventional breeding methodologies.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent App. No. 63/120,292, filed Dec. 2, 2020, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

BACKGROUND

Current trends in the international petroleum market and concerns on the excessive use of petroleum-derived fuels on the environment have led to increased interest in the development and adoption of renewable sources of energy in the USA. In some instances this has derived in the adoption of government policies, like the Energy Independency and Security Act of 2007 (Public Law 110-140, 2007), in others in the take-over of private initiatives like that aimed at using plant-derived renewable fuels to partly satisfy the fuel demand of the aviation industry (Anonymous, 2009).

Among the several types of feedstocks proposed for the production of renewable fuel, use of industrial-grade oilseed crops are considered a viable option. Camelina (Camelina sativa, (L.) Crantz), an annual plant that belongs to the Brassicaceae family, is an oilseed crop that can produce decent yields under relative low inputs, exhibits a broad adaptability to a range of environmental conditions, and its seeds contain a relatively high amount of oil (Putnam et al., 1993; Budin et al., 1995; Vollman et al., 1996; Gugel and Falk, 2006). In addition, studies on the impact of Camelina-derived fuel on the environment indicates that use of this fuel can reduce carbon emissions by up to 80% (Shonnard et al., 2010) conferring this crop a potential to be used as biofuel feedstock crop.

Although Camelina is a plant with a rich history (Schultze-Motel, J., 1979; Bouby, 1998), in general little genetic improvement has been practiced on this crop. In the USA, although efforts were devoted to this crop in the past (Porcher, 1863, Robinson, 1987), currently the number of varieties available for commercial production is very limited. Consequently, there is a real need to develop Camelina varieties with high productivity and broad adaptability, especially to low-input agricultural systems in the USA, to be used as reliable, commercial feedstocks for the emerging biofuel industry.

The main object of the invention is to provide seed of a superior Camelina variety that provides high and stable yields and is suitable of commercial production under low-input agricultural areas in various temperate regions. Another object is to provide seed of a Camelina variety that exhibits acceptable and stable agronomic characteristics.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The subject invention provides Camelina plants having unique reproductive attributes associated with grain and oil yield superiority, and the ability to grow efficiently and consistently under dryland, low-input and/or high-input conditions. The subject invention also provides methods of producing the Camelina plants, as well as methods of introducing one or more desired traits into the Camelina plants.

In preferred embodiments, the Camelina plants of the subject invention are of the Camelina sativa (L.) variety. In specific preferred embodiments, the Camelina sativa (L.)

variety is the Camelina plant designated as “SO-120,” a representative seed sample of which has been deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-126940 on Dec. 18, 2020.

In some embodiments, the Camelina plant is a plant having one or more, or all the physiological and morphological characteristics of Camelina sativa (L.) variety “SO-120.” In some embodiments, the Camelina plant is derived from a cross between a first parent Camelina plant and a second parent Camelina plant, wherein the first and/or second Camelina plants are Camelina sativa (L.) variety “SO-120,” or Camelina plants having one or more, or all, of the physiological and morphological characteristics of Camelina sativa (L.) variety “SO-120.”

In preferred embodiments, the Camelina plants of the subject invention have high grain and oil yields compared to a check line of Camelina. In some embodiments, the check line is, for example, Calena, Ligena, Blaine Creek, Cs11, Cs21, Celine, Galena, Robinson, and/or Suneson.

In certain embodiments, the Camelina plants of the subject invention have higher grain and oil yields when compared with Camelina sativa (L.) variety “SO-50,” a description of which can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 8,319,021 (incorporated by reference herein).

In some embodiments, the Camelina plants of the subject invention are developed through conventional breeding methods, having the ability to grow efficiently and consistently under dryland, low-input and/or high-input conditions.

In some embodiments, the distinctive features of the subject plants compared to a check line include one or more of: a higher seed weight (e.g., 1.33 g/1,000), a higher test weight (e.g., 51.5 lb/Bu), a higher grain yield (e.g., about 1,509 lb/ac) and a higher oil yield (e.g., about 544 lb/ac). Additionally, the plants are stable in their performance across a wide range of environmental conditions (see FIGS. 1-2).

In certain embodiments, the subject invention also provides plant parts of the subject Camelina plants. Plant parts can include, for example, the shoot, root, stem, seeds, racemes, stipules, leaves, petals, flowers, ovules, bracts, branches, petioles, internodes, pollen, stamen, or the like.

In some embodiments, the plant part is the seed of the Camelina plant designated as “SO-120” (ATCC No. PTA-126940).

In certain embodiments, the subject invention also provides plant cells of the subject Camelina plants. In some embodiments, the plant cell(s) can be cultured and used to produce a Camelina plant having one or more, or all, of the physiological and morphological characteristics of the subject Camelina plants.

In certain embodiments, the subject invention also provides tissue culture of the subject Camelina plants. In some embodiments, the tissue culture(s) are produced from a plant part such as, for example, embryos, meristematic cells, leaves, pollen, root, root tips, stems, anther, pistils, pods, flowers, and seeds. In some embodiments, the tissue culture can be used to regenerate a Camelina sativa (L.) plant, said plant having the morphological and physiological characteristics of Camelina sativa (L.) variety “SO-120” (ATCC No. PTA-126940).

In certain embodiments, the subject invention provides methods of producing the subject Camelina plants. In some embodiments, the plants are produced through conventional breeding methods.

In certain embodiments, the subject invention provides methods for producing a Camelina seed. In some embodiments, the methods comprise crossing a first parent Camelina plant with a second parent Camelina plant and harvesting the resultant hybrid seed, wherein the first parent Camelina plant and/or second parent Camelina plant is a Camelina sativa (L.) plant of the subject invention.

In certain embodiments, the subject invention provides methods for introducing one or more desired traits into the subject Camelina plants.

In some embodiments, the methods comprise introducing one or more transgenes into the genome of the subject Camelina plants. In some embodiments, the methods comprise crossing the Camelina plants of the subject invention to one or more transgenic plants, wherein the transgenic plants comprise one or more transgenes.

In some embodiments, the transgene is a gene for herbicide resistance in a plant, and the herbicide is selected from the group consisting of imidazolinone, sulfonylurea, glyphosate, glufosinate, L-phosphinothricin, triazine, sethoxydim, and benzonitrile. In some embodiments, the transgene is a gene for insect resistance in a plant, for example, the transgene encodes a Bacillus thuringiensis endotoxin. In some embodiments, the transgene is a gene for disease resistant in a plant. In some embodiments, the transgene is a gene for water stress tolerance, heat tolerance, improved shelf life, and/or improved nutritional quality.

In some embodiments, the methods for introducing one or more desired traits into the subject Camelina plants comprise:

(a) crossing a Camelina plant of the subject invention with another Camelina plant that comprises a desired trait to produce F1 progeny plants;

(b) selecting one or more progeny plants that have the desired trait to produce selected progeny plants;

(c) crossing the selected progeny plants with the Camelina plant of the subject invention to produce backcross progeny plants;

(d) selecting for backcross progeny plants that have the desired trait and physiological and morphological characteristics of the Camelina plant of the subject invention to produce selected backcross progeny plants; and

(e) optionally, repeating steps (c) and (d) three or more times in succession to produce selected fourth or higher backcross progeny plants that comprise the desired trait and the physiological and morphological characteristics of the Camelina plant of the subject invention.

In some embodiments, the desired trait is, for example, selected from the group consisting of insect resistance, disease resistance, water stress tolerance, heat tolerance, improved shelf life, and improved nutritional quality.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

FIG. 1 shows a stability of performance curve for SO-120, Calena and Blaine Creek varieties.

FIG. 2 shows the linear regression coefficient and residual variance from stability of performance analyses of SO-120, Blaine Creek and Calena according to Finlay and Wilkinson (1963) and Eberhart and Russell (1966).

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The subject invention provides Camelina plants having reproductive attributes that lead to high grain yield and high oil yield, and the ability to grow efficiently and consistently under dryland, low-input and/or high-input conditions. The subject invention also provides methods of producing the Camelina plants, as well as methods of introducing one or more desired traits into the Camelina plants.

Selected Definitions

As used herein:

“Days to 50% flowering” refers to period from germination of the seed to the manifestation of flowering in 50% of the plant population;

“Days to Maturity” refers to the period from germination of the seed to the period when fully developed seeds where developed in 50% of the plant population;

“Seed filling days” refers to the period from the beginning of seed growth until the seed is fully developed and has reached maximum dry weight;

“Plant height” refers to the height of the adult plant from the ground base where it is being grown to the tip of the main raceme;

“Racemes per plant” refers to the number of reproductive branches derived from the main stem of the plant;

“Main raceme length” refers to the length of the terminal raceme in the plant;

“Inflorescence length” refers to the length of the main inflorescence from its base to the tip of the terminal raceme;

“Inflorescence diameter” refers to the diameter of the inflorescence at its widest plane and is measured right after flowering has been completed;

“Pod number” refers to the total number of pods in the plant bearing seeds;

“Pod weight” refers to the weight of a pod once the plant has reached maturity and consequently is ready to be harvested;

“Seeds per pod” refers to the number of fully developed seed contained inside a pod in the plant;

“Seeds per plant” refers to the total number of fully developed seeds the plant has produced;

“Seed weight” refers to the total weight of a fully developed seed, usually expressed in weight per thousand seeds;

“Test weight” refers to a measure of the seed weight in pounds for a given bushel volume;

“Grain yield” refers to a measure of the harvested clean seed weight in pounds in one acre of land area;

“Oil content” refers to the fraction of total oil contained in the mature seed;

“Oil yield” refers to a measure of the seed oil weight collected in pounds in one acre of land area;

“Variety” refers to a homogeneous, highly homozygous group of individuals that are genetically distinct from other groups of individuals within the species;

“Cross” refers to the process by which pollen from one flower from a plant is artificially transferred to the stigma from the flower of another plant;

“Progeny” refers to the offspring derived from an artificial cross between two plants;

“Selfing” refers to the manifestation of the process of self-pollination, which in turn refers to the transfer of pollen from the anther of a flower to the stigma of the same flower or different flowers on the same plant;

“Single plant selection” refers to a form of selection in which plants with specific desirable attributes are identified and individually selected; and

“Seed increase” refers to the process of sowing, growing and harvesting seed from a specific plant material for the purpose of creating a larger volume of seed.

As used herein, the term “plant” refers to any living organism belonging to the kingdom Plantae (i.e., any genus/species in the Plant Kingdom). In preferred embodiments, the plant is a species in the tribe of Camelineae, such as Camelina alyssum, C. anomala, C. grandiflora, C. hispida, C. laxa, C. microcarpa, C. microphylla, C. persisters, C. rumelica, C. sativa, C. Stiefelhagenii, and/or any hybrid thereof.

As used herein, the terms “plant part” and “plant tissue” are used interchangeably and refer to any portion(s) of a plant including, but not limited to, the shoot, root, stem, seeds, racemes, stipules, stalks, leaves, petals flowers, ovules, bracts, branches, petioles, internodes, tiller, pollen, stamen, and the like. “Aerial” plant parts refer to above-ground plant parts, which can also be referred to as “shoots.” “Subterranean” plant parts refer to below-ground plant parts, which can also be referred to as “roots.”

As used herein, the term “cross,” “crossing,” “cross-pollination” or “cross-breeding” refer to the process by which the pollen of one flower on one plant is applied (artificially or naturally) to the ovule (stigma) of a flower on another plant.

As used herein, the term “gene” refers to any segment of DNA associated with a biological function. Thus, genes include, but are not limited to, coding sequences and/or the regulatory sequences required for their expression. Genes can also include non-expressed DNA segments that, for example, form recognition sequences for other proteins. Genes can be obtained from a variety of sources, including cloning from a source of interest or synthesizing from known or predicted sequence information, and may include sequences designed to have desired parameters.

The transitional term “comprising,” which is synonymous with “including,” or “containing,” is inclusive or open-ended and does not exclude additional, unrecited elements or method steps. By contrast, the transitional phrase “consisting of” excludes any element, step, or ingredient not specified in the claim. The transitional phrase “consisting essentially of” limits the scope of a claim to the specified materials or steps “and those that do not materially affect the basic and novel characteristic(s)” of the claimed invention. Use of the term “comprising” contemplates other embodiments that “consist” or “consist essentially” of the recited component(s).

Unless specifically stated or obvious from context, as used herein, the term “or” is understood to be inclusive. Unless specifically stated or obvious from context, as used herein, the terms “a,” “and” and “the” are understood to be singular or plural.

Unless specifically stated or obvious from context, as used herein, the term “about” is understood as within a range of normal tolerance in the art, for example within 2 standard deviations of the mean. About can be understood as within 10%, 9%, 8%, 7%, 6%, 5%, 4%, 3%, 2%, 1%, 0.5%, 0.1%, 0.05%, or 0.01% of the stated value.

The recitation of a listing of chemical groups in any definition of a variable herein includes definitions of that variable as any single group or combination of listed groups. The recitation of an embodiment for a variable or aspect herein includes that embodiment as any single embodiment or in combination with any other embodiments or portions thereof.

All references cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.

Camelina sativa

Camelina sativa, known in English as Camelina, gold-of-pleasure, false flax, wild flax, linseed dodder, German sesame, and Siberian oilseed, is a flowering plant in the family Brassicaceae, which includes, for example, mustard, cabbage, rapeseed, broccoli, cauliflower, kale, and brussels sprouts. Camelina is native to Northern Europe and to Central Asia, but has been introduced to North America, possibly as a weed in flax imports.

The crop is now being researched due to its exceptionally high levels (up to 45%) of omega-3 fatty acids, which is uncommon in vegetable sources. The fatty acid composition of Camelina comprises high levels of polyunsaturated fatty acids, such as C18:2 and C18:3 fatty acids (52-54%), as well as long chain fatty acids, such as C20:1 (11-15%) and C22:1 (2-5%) fatty acids.

Camelina oil is well-suited for use as a cooking oil. It has an almond-like flavor and aroma. The major components of Camelina oil are alpha-linolenic acid (C18:3 (omega-3-fatty acid, approximately 35-45%) and linoleic acid (C18:2 (omega-6 fatty acid, approximately 15-20%)). Camelina oil is also very rich in natural antioxidants, such as tocopherols, which contributes to the highly stable character of the oil, as well as its resistance to oxidation and rancidity. Other components of Camelina oil include, for example, erucic acid (1-3%) and vitamin E (about110 mg/100 g). (Pilgeram et al., 2007; Vollmann et al. 1996; Putnam et al., 1993; Berti and Schneiter, 1993; Pavlista and Baltensperger, 2007).

In addition to its oil, Camelina plant parts can be used as commercial feed, as well as to produce useful chemicals, for example, camalexins (Browne et al., 1991).

Methods of transforming Camelina plants have been described in US20040031076, US20090151028, US20090151023, WO/2002/038779A1, and WO/2009/117555A1, each of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.

Methods for Camelina tissue culture have been described previously. For example, Camelina sativa shoots have been regenerated from leaf explants (Tattersall and Millam, Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture 55:147-149, 1999). Camelina sativa has also been used in a somatic fusion with other Brassica species (Narasimhulu et al., Plant Cell Rep. 13:657-660, 1994; Hansen, Crucifer. News 19:55-56, 1997; Sigareva and Earle, Theor. Appl. Genet. 98:164-170, 1999) and regenerated interspecific hybrid plants were obtained (Sigareva and Earle).

More tissue culture techniques for Camelina can be found in Bhojwani and Razdan (Plant tissue culture: theory and practice, Elsevier, 1996, ISBN 97804448162328), Trigiano and Gray (Plant tissue culture concepts and laboratory exercises, Volume 1999, CRC Press, 2000, ISBN 0849320291, 9780849320293), Kumar (Plant Tissue Culture And Molecular Markers: Their Role In Improving Crop Productivity, I. K. International Pvt Ltd, 2009, ISBN 8189866109, 9788189866105), George et al., (Plant Propagation by Tissue Culture 3rd Edition: Volume 1. the Background, ISBN 1402050046, 9781402050046). Sathyanarayana (Plant Tissue Culture: Practices and New Experimental Protocols, I. K. International Pvt Ltd, 2007, ISBN 8189866117, 9788189866112), Pierik (In vitro culture of higher plants, Springer, 1997, ISBN 0792345274, 9780792345275), and Vasil (Plant cell and tissue culture, Springer, 1994, ISBN 0792324935, 9780792324935), each of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety herein for all purposes.

Camelina sativa (L.) Variety “SO-120”

Camelina sativa (L.) variety “SO-120” is a true-bred Camelina selected from a cross between accession “CS67” a material of unknown origin, and accession “Ames 1043,” a material originated in Poland. A representative sample of seeds of “SO-120” has been deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-126940 on Dec. 18, 2020.

Breeding Methods

Open-Pollinated Populations. The improvement of open-pollinated populations of such crops as rye, many maizes and sugar beets, herbage grasses, legumes such as alfalfa and clover, and tropical tree crops such as cacao, coconuts, oil palm and some rubber, depends essentially upon changing gene-frequencies towards fixation of favorable alleles while maintaining a high (but far from maximal) degree of heterozygosity. Uniformity in such populations is impossible and trueness-to-type in an open-pollinated variety is a statistical feature of the population as a whole, not a characteristic of individual plants. Thus, the heterogeneity of open-pollinated populations contrasts with the homogeneity (or virtually so) of inbred lines, clones and hybrids.

Population improvement methods fall naturally into two groups, those based on purely phenotypic selection, normally called mass selection, and those based on selection with progeny testing. Interpopulation improvement utilizes the concept of open breeding populations; allowing genes to flow from one population to another. Plants in one population (cultivar, strain, ecotype, or any germplasm source) are crossed either naturally (e.g., by wind) or by hand or by bees (commonly Apis mellifera L. or Megachile rotundata F.) with plants from other populations. Selection is applied to improve one (or sometimes both) population(s) by isolating plants with desirable traits from both sources.

There are several primary methods of open-pollinated population improvement. First, there is the situation in which a population is changed en masse by a chosen selection procedure. The outcome is an improved population that is indefinitely propagable by random-mating within itself in isolation. Second, the synthetic variety attains the same end result as population improvement but is not itself propagable as such; it has to be reconstructed from parental lines or clones. Third, a method used in plant species that are largely self-pollinated in nature, such as soybeans, wheat, rice, safflower, Camelina and others is pedigree selection. In this situation, crosses are made and individual plants and lines from individual plants are selected for desired traits. These lines are then advanced as genetically homogeneous varieties. Since the individuals are largely self-pollinated these lines are analogous to an inbred line with favorable agronomic characteristics. These plant breeding procedures for improving open-pollinated populations are well known to those skilled in the art and comprehensive reviews of breeding procedures routinely used for improving cross-pollinated plants are provided in numerous texts and articles, including: Allard, Principles of Plant Breeding, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (1960); Simmonds, Principles of Crop Improvement, Longman Group Limited (1979); Hallauer and Miranda, Quantitative Genetics in Maize Breeding, Iowa State University Press (1981); and, Jensen, Plant Breeding Methodology, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (1988).

Mass Selection. In mass selection, desirable individual plants are chosen, harvested, and the seed composited without progeny testing to produce the following generation. Since selection is based on the maternal parent only, and there is no control over pollination, mass selection amounts to a form of random mating with selection. As stated above, the purpose of mass selection is to increase the proportion of superior genotypes in the population.

Synthetics. A synthetic variety is produced by crossing inter se a number of genotypes selected for good combining ability in all possible hybrid combinations, with subsequent maintenance of the variety by open pollination. Whether parents are (more or less inbred) seed-propagated lines, as in some sugar beet and beans (Vicia) or clones, as in herbage grasses, clovers and alfalfa, makes no difference in principle. Parents are selected on general combining ability, sometimes by test crosses or toperosses, more generally by polycrosses. Parental seed lines may be deliberately inbred (e.g. by selfing or sib crossing). However, even if the parents are not deliberately inbred, selection within lines during line maintenance will ensure that some inbreeding occurs. Clonal parents will, of course, remain unchanged and highly heterozygous.

Whether a synthetic can go straight from the parental seed production plot to the farmer or must first undergo one or two cycles of multiplication depends on seed production and the scale of demand for seed. In practice, grasses and clovers are generally multiplied once or twice and are thus considerably removed from the original synthetic. While mass selection is sometimes used, progeny testing is generally preferred for polycrosses, because of their operational simplicity and obvious relevance to the objective, namely exploitation of general combining ability in a synthetic.

The number of parental lines or clones that enter a synthetic vary widely. In practice, numbers of parental lines range from 10 to several hundred, with 100-200 being the average. Broad based synthetics formed from 100 or more clones would be expected to be more stable during seed multiplication than narrow based synthetics.

Pedigreed varieties. A pedigreed variety is a superior genotype developed from selection of individual plants out of a segregating population followed by propagation and seed increase of self-pollinated offspring and careful testing of the genotype over several generations. This is an open pollinated method that works well with naturally self-pollinating species. This method can be used in combination with mass selection in variety development. Variations in pedigree and mass selection in combination are the most common methods for generating varieties in self-pollinated crops.

Hybrids. A hybrid is an individual plant resulting from a cross between parents of differing genotypes. Commercial hybrids are now used extensively in many crops, including corn (maize), sorghum, sugarbeet, sunflower and broccoli. Hybrids can be formed in a number of different ways, including by crossing two parents directly (single cross hybrids), by crossing a single cross hybrid with another parent (three-way or triple cross hybrids), or by crossing two different hybrids (four-way or double cross hybrids).

Strictly speaking, most individuals in an out breeding (i.e., open-pollinated) population are hybrids, but the term is usually reserved for cases in which the parents are individuals whose genomes are sufficiently distinct for them to be recognized as different species or subspecies. Hybrids may be fertile or sterile depending on qualitative and/or quantitative differences in the genomes of the two parents. Heterosis, or hybrid vigor, is usually associated with increased heterozygosity that results in increased vigor of growth, survival, and fertility of hybrids as compared with the parental lines that were used to form the hybrid. Maximum heterosis is usually achieved by crossing two genetically different, highly inbred lines.

The production of hybrids is a well-developed industry, involving the isolated production of both the parental lines and the hybrids which result from crossing those lines. For a detailed discussion of the hybrid production process, see, e.g., Wright, Commercial Hybrid Seed Production 8:161-176, In Hybridization of Crop Plants.

Additional breeding methods have been known to one of ordinary skill in the art, e.g., methods discussed in Chahal and Gosal (Principles and procedures of plant breeding: biotechnological and conventional approaches, CRC Press, 2002, ISBN 084931321X, 9780849313219), Taji et al. (In vitro plant breeding, Routledge, 2002, ISBN 156022908X, 9781560229087), Richards (Plant breeding systems, Taylor & Francis US, 1997, ISBN 0412574500, 9780412574504), Hayes (Methods of Plant Breeding, READ BOOKS, 2007, ISBN 1406737062, 9781406737066), and Lorz et al. (Molecular marker systems in plant breeding and crop improvement, Springer, 2005, ISBN 3540206892, 9783540206897), each of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.

Deposit Information

A deposit of the seed of Camelina sativa (L.) variety “SO-120” is maintained by Sustainable Oils, Inc., 2790 Skypark Dr. Suite 105, Torrance, Calif., 90505, USA. In addition, a sample of the seed of Camelina sativa (L.) variety “SO-120” has been deposited by Sustainable Oils, Inc., with American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), 10801 University Blvd. Manassas, Va. 20110-2209, USA.

To satisfy the enablement requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 112, and to certify that the deposit of the seeds of the present invention meets the criteria set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 1.801-1.809, Applicants hereby make the following statements regarding the deposited seed of Camelina sativa (L.) variety “SO-120” (deposited as ATCC Accession No. PTA-126940 on Dec. 18, 2020):

-   -   1. During the pendency of this application, access to the         invention will be afforded to the Commissioner upon request;     -   2. Upon granting of the patent the strain will be available to         the public under conditions specified in 37 CFR § 1.808;     -   3. The deposit will be maintained in a public repository for a         period of 30 years or 5 years after the last request or for the         enforceable life of the patent, whichever is longer;     -   4. The viability of the biological material at the time of         deposit will be tested; and     -   5. The deposit will be replaced if it should ever become         unavailable.

Access to this deposit will be available during the pendency of this application to persons determined by the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks to be entitled thereto under 37 C.F.R. § 1.14 and 35 U.S.C. § 122. Upon allowance of any claims in this application, all restrictions on the availability to the public of the variety will be irrevocably removed by affording access to a deposit of at least 625 seeds of the same seed source with ATCC. The Applicant does not waive any infringement of their rights granted under this patent or under the Plant Variety Protection Act (7 U.S.C. § 2321 et seq.). U.S. Plant Variety Protection of SO-120 is being applied for. Unauthorized seed multiplication prohibited.

EXAMPLES

It should be understood that the examples and embodiments described herein are for illustrative purposes only and that various modifications or changes in light thereof will be suggested to persons skilled in the art and are to be included within the spirit and purview of this application.

Example 1—Testing of Seed Quality Traits

The present invention is based on the development of true-bred Camelina seeds with unique characteristics, including, for example, heavier seed weight and higher test weight. Advantageously, in some embodiments, the unique characteristics include, and/or contribute to, increased oil and grain yields.

The oil content in the Camelina seed was determined using contiguous wave low-resolution nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectrometry at the Seed Lab at Oregon State University (Seed Science & Technology, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oreg., 97331).

Example 2—Agronomic Performance Field Evaluation of Camelina sativa (L.) SO-120

During the spring of 2010, 2011, and 2019, the performance of SO-120 was evaluated in representative areas within the Pacific Northwest and the Northern High Plains of the US including Oregon (Pendleton), Montana (Amsterdam, Bozeman, Huntley, Moccasin and Havre), Nebraska (Scottsbluff), Washington (Dusty), Wyoming (Lingle) and North Dakota (Carrington), USA. Two standard Camelina varieties, “Calena” and “Blaine Creek” were included in these trials as controls for comparative purposes. These evaluations were carried out under standard production practices.

Combined across all years and all environments, the average grain yield for SO-120 was 1,509 Lb/ac (range of 717 to 2,440 Lb/ac), which was 6.5% higher than the mean yield of Calena (1,417 Lb/ac; range of 747 to 2240 Lb/ac) and 11.7% higher than Blaine Creek (1,351 Lb/ac; range of 683 to 2516 Lb/ac) (Table 1).

SO-120 has a linear stability coefficient (b) of 0.97 and a variance deviation from linear regression (σ²) of 14700 (FIGS. 1-2). Thus, variety SO-120 should be considered a high-yielding variety with good adaptability to low-input growing conditions.

Combined across all years and all environments, the average seed oil content for SO-120 was 35.6% (range of 27.0 to 42.1%), which was equal to the seed oil content of Calena (35.6%, range of 27.4 to 42%) but 1.4% lower than that of Blaine creek (36.1%, range of 28.5 to 42.4%) (Table 2).

Combined across all years and all environments, the average oil yield for SO-120 was 544 Lb/ac (range of 232 to 839 Lb/ac), which was 6.2% higher than the mean yield of Calena (512 Lb/ac; range of 205 to 888 Lb/ac) and 9.2% higher than Blaine Creek (498 Lb/ac; range of 195 to 906 Lb/ac) (Table 3). Thus, SO-120 should be considered a higher oil-yielding variety.

In general, other than an increased seed weight (e.g., 1.33 g/1,000) and an increased test weight (e.g., 51.5 lb/Bu), SO-120 exhibited agronomic and phenologic characteristics that were comparable to the control varieties (Tables 4-8).

TABLE 1 Grain yield (Lb/ac) of eamelina variety SO-120 and other control camelina varieties Bozeman Carrington Dusty Havre Huntley Lingle Pendleton Amsterdam Carrington Variety 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2011 2011 SO-120 1451 2077 1131 2101 1725 1407 2013 1416 1285 Calena 954 2065 981 2228 1558 1484 1395 1374 1100 Blaine Creek 852 1968 1025 1678 1645 1311 1868 1202 872 Mean 1086 2036 1046 2003 1642 1401 1759 1331 1086 p value *** NS NS NS NS NS * NS * CV (%) 9 12 14 24 13 24 9 12 12 LSD (0.05) 2.3 — — — — — 3.7 — 241.2 Havre Huntley Pendleton Huntley Moccasin Pendleton Scottsbluff Variety 2011 2011 2011 2019 2019 2019 2019 Combined SO-120 1364 1440 1469 717 1248 2440 861 1509 Calena 1442 1373 1701 776 1256 2240 747 1417 Blaine Creek 1112 1218 1717 714 1236 2516 683 1351 Mean 1306 1344 1629 736 1246 2399 764 1426 p value * NS NS NS NS NS NS *** CV (%) 9 16 13 12 8 6 8 14 LSD (0.05) 225.2 — — — — — — 78.3 *, *** Significant at the 0.05 and 0.001 probability levels. NS Not significant.

TABLE 2 Seed oil content (%) of camelina variety SO-120 and other control camelina varieties Bozeman Carrington Dusty Havre Huntley Lingle Pendleton Amsterdam Carrington Variety 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2011 2011 SO-120 41.1 38.7 37.3 40.0 39.4 33.0 36.3 34.4 28.8 Catena 40.0 39.8 34.8 40.2 39.2 32.9 36.7 34.8 29.1 Blaine Creek 40.4 39.7 35.7 40.8 40.3 31.8 37.5 35.7 29.9 Mean 40.5 39.4 35.9 40.3 39.6 32.6 36.8 35.0 29.2 p value NS NS NS NS NS NS NS * NS CV (%) 1 1 3 4 3 1 5 1 3 LSD (0.05) — — — — — — — 0.9 — Havre Huntley Pendleton Huntley Moccasin Pendleton Scottsbluff Variety 2011 2011 2011 2019 2019 2019 2019 Combined SO-120 36.4 32.9 42.1 34.8 33.7 34.2 27.0 35.6 Calena 35.6 33.0 42.0 35.1 35.2 33.8 27.4 35.6 Blaine Creek 37.3 33.2 42.4 35.2 33.9 35.5 28.5 36.1 Mean 36.4 33.0 42.2 35.0 34.3 34.5 27.6 35.8 p value NS NS NS NS NS ** NS * CV (%) 4 3 2 4 6 1 6 3 LSD (0.05) — — — — — 0.7 — 0.5 *, ** Significant at the 0.05, and 0.01 probability levels. NS Not significant.

TABLE 3 Oil yield (lb/ac) of camelina variety SO-120 and other control camelina varieties Bozeman Carrington Dusty Havre Huntley Lingle Pendleton Amsterdam Carrington Variety 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2011 2011 SO-120 596 803 417 839 678 463 731 487 369 Calena 382 822 339 888 614 489 510 479 320 Blaine Creek 345 781 365 683 664 419 697 430 261 Mean 441 802 374 803 652 457 646 465 317 p value *** NS NS NS NS NS ** NS * CV (%) 9 12 13 20 15 24 5 12 13 LSD (0.05) 93.3 — — — — — 86.6 — 71.0 Havre Huntley Pendleton Huntley Moccasin Pendleton Scottsbluff Variety 2011 2011 2011 2019 2019 2019 2019 Combined SO-120 497 474 618 250 423 824 232 544 Calena 494 453 715 274 443 764 205 512 Blaine Creek 415 404 727 252 425 906 195 498 Mean 469 444 687 259 431 831 210 518 p value NS NS NS NS NS NS NS ** CV (%) 13 16 13 15 13 8 10 15 LSD (0.05) — — — — — — — 29.3 *, **, *** Significant at the 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001 probability levels. NS Not significant.

TABLE 4 Days to 50% flowering of camelina variety SO-120 and other control camelina varieties Bozeman Carrington Dusty Havre Huntley Lingle Pendleton Amsterdam Carrington Variety 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2011 2011 SO-120 — 51 73 71 68 67 — 52 44 Calena — 50 73 72 69 67 — 51 43 Blaine Creek — 50 72 70 68 66 — 49 43 Mean — 50 73 71 68 66 — 50 43 p value — NS NS NS NS NS — *** * CV (%) — 1 1 4 1 1 — 1 1 LSD (0.05) — — — — — — — 0.8 0.7 Havre Huntley Pendleton Huntley Moccasin Pendleton Scottsbluff Variety 2011 2011 2011 2019 2019 2019 2019 Combined SO-120 63 86 — 56 63 56 — 63 Calena 62 85 — 56 64 58 — 63 Blaine Creek 62 84 — 55 61 56 — 62 Mean 63 85 — 56 63 57 — 62 p value NS NS — NS ** * — *** CV (%) 1 1 — 1 1 1 — 1 LSD (0.05) — — — — 1.3 1.7 — 0.4 *, **, *** Significant at the 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001 probability levels. NS Not significant.

TABLE 5 Seed filling days of camelina variety SO-120 and other control camelina varieties Bozeman Carrington Dusty Havre Huntley Lingle Pendleton Amsterdam Carrington Variety 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2011 2011 SO-120 — 29 34 38 36 — — 32 29 Calena — 28 33 39 36 — — 33 29 Blaine Creek — 28 35 36 36 — — 34 28 Mean — 28 34 38 36 — — 33 28 p value — NS NS * NS — — ** NS CV (%) — 5 3 2 2 — — 2 4 LSD (0.05) — — — 2.0 — — — 1.0 — Havre Huntley Pendleton Huntley Moccasin Pendleton Scottsbluff Variety 2011 2011 2011 2019 2019 2019 2019 Combined SO-120 32 27 — 34 25 36 — 32 Calena 33 28 — 34 25 33 — 32 Blaine Creek 33 27 — 32 27 33 — 32 Mean 32 27 — 34 26 34 — 32 p value NS NS — NS * NS — NS CV (%) 4 4 — 5 3 4 — 3 LSD (0.05) — — — — 1.8 — — — *, ** Significant at the 0.05 and 0.01 probability levels. NS Not significant.

TABLE 6 Plant height (in) of camelina variety SO-120 and other control camelina varieties Bozeman Carrington Dusty Havre Huntley Lingle Pendleton Amsterdam Carrington Variety 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2011 2011 SO-120 — 29 29 33 40 28 — 27 33 Calena — 29 31 35 40 28 — 26 33 Blaine Creek — 31 31 33 39 27 — 25 30 Mean — 30 30 34 40 28 — 26 32 p value — NS NS NS NS NS — ** NS CV (%) — 12 6 6 6 5 — 2 9 LSD (0.05) — — — — — — — 1.0 — Havre Huntley Pendleton Huntley Moccasin Pendleton Scottsbluff Variety 2011 2011 2011 2019 2019 2019 2019 Combined SO-120 29 31 32 29 38 35 29 32 Calena 29 29 34 29 38 33 28 32 Blaine Creek 27 29 36 29 35 36 29 31 Mean 28 30 34 29 37 35 29 31 p value NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS CV (%) 7 7 6 6 4 7 5 1 LSD (0.05) — — — — — — — — ** Significant at the 0.01 probability level. NS Not significant,

TABLE 7 Seed weight (g/1,000) of camelina variety SO-120 and other control camelina varieties Bozeman Carrington Dusty Havre Huntley Lingle Pendleton Amsterdam Carrington Variety 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2011 2011 SO-120 1.51 1.53 1.40 1.47 1.39 1.53 1.44 1.25 0.99 Calena 1.36 1.41 1.34 1.48 1.33 1.55 1.41 1.17 0.95 Blaine Creek 1.36 1.43 1.33 1.55 1.21 1.43 1.37 1.12 0.90 Mean 1.41 1.46 1.36 1.50 1.31 1.50 1.41 1.18 0.95 p value NS * NS NS *** NS NS * NS CV (%) 6 3 7 8 2 6 6 3 7 LSD (0.05) — 0.08 — — 0.07 — — 0.08 — Havre Huntley Pendleton Huntley Moccasin Pendleton Scottsbluff Variety 2011 2011 2011 2019 2019 2019 2019 Combined SO-120 1.23 1.07 1.17 — — — — 1.33 Calena 1.11 1.04 1.18 — — — — 1.28 Blaine Creek 1.05 0.95 1.15 — — — — 1.24 Mean 1.13 1.02 1.17 — — — — 1.28 p value NS ** NS — — — — *** CV (%) 10 2 6 — — — — 6 LSD (0.05) — 0.05 — — — — — 0.04 *, **, *** Significant at the 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001 probability levels. NS Not significant.

TABLE 8 Test weight (lb/Bu) of camelina variety SO-120 and other control camelina varieties Bozeman Carrington Dusty Havre Huntley Lingle Pendleton Amsterdam Carrington Variety 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2011 2011 SO-120 53.7 53.1 — 52.2 53.1 — — 51.7 49.6 Calena 52.9 52.9 — 52.4 52.5 — — 51.8 49.5 Blaine Creek 52.9 52.7 — 52.4 52.4 — — 51.7 48.4 Mean 53.2 52.9 — 52.3 52.7 — — 51.8 49.2 p value NS NS — NS * — — NS * CV (%) 2 1 — <1 <1 — — <1 1 LSD (0.05) — — — — 0.2 — — — 1.1 Havre Huntley Pendleton Huntley Moccasin Pendleton Scottsbluff Variety 2011 2011 2011 2019 2019 2019 2019 Combined SO-120 52.3 50.4 52.5 47.3 50.3 52.3 — 51.5 Calena 52.0 50.5 52.3 46.7 50.9 52.1 — 51.4 Blaine Creek 51.9 51.1 52.1 45.2 50.4 52.2 — 51.1 Mean 52.1 50.6 52.3 46.4 50.5 52.2 — 51.3 p value NS ** NS NS NS NS — ** CV (%) 1 <1 1 3 2 <1 — 1 LSD (0.05) — 0.4 — — — — — 0.3 *, ** Significant at the 0.05 and 0.01 probability levels. NS Not significant.

Example 4—Development of SO-120

The present invention involves the development of true-bred Camelina seeds capable of growing and providing adequate seed yields under high-input, low-input, and/or dryland conditions in North America and other temperate regions, and having but not being limited to the following characteristics compared to other popular Camelina varieties:

-   -   (i) a medium seed oil content of about, e.g., 35.6% (range of         27.0 to 42.1%);     -   (ii) a medium flowering period of about, e.g., 63 DAP (range of         44 to 86 DAP);     -   (iii) a medium seed filling period of about, e.g., 32 days         (range of 25 to 38 days);     -   (iv) a medium to high plant height of about, e.g., 32         inches/81.3 cm (range of 27 to 40 inches (68.6 to 101.6 cm);     -   (v) a medium to high seed weight of about, e.g., 1.33 g/1,000         seeds (range of 0.99 to 1.53 g/1,000);     -   (vi) a medium to high test weight of about, e.g., 51.5 Lb/Bu         (range of 47.3 to 53.7 Lb/Bu);     -   (vii) a high oil yield of about, e.g., 544 lb/ac (range of 232         to 839 Lb/ac); and     -   (viii) a high grain yield of about, e.g., 1,509 lb/ac (range of         717 to 2,440 Lb/ac).

Variety “SO-120” was developed from a cross between accession “CS67,” a material of unknown origin, and accession “Ames1043,” a material originated in Poland. These accessions were evaluated for agronomic performance, adaptability, and oil quality attributes (fatty acid profile) across multiple locations during the period of 2006-2009 (Tables 9 and 10).

TABLE 9 Specifics on field evaluations of parental accessions “CS67” and “Ames 1043.” Set Entries Year Season Site(s)^(†) 1 33 2006 Spring 8 2 45 2007 Spring 5 3 12 2007 Spring 11 4 20 2007/2008 Winter 1 5 20 2008 Spring 25 6 20 2008 Spring 5 7 20 2008/2009 Winter 1 8 21 2009 Spring 7 9 20 2009 Spring 16 ^(†)Sites covered representative areas AZ, ID, MT, ND, NE, NM, OR, SD, WA, and WY in the USA, and in Alberta, Manioba, and Saskatchewan, in Canada

TABLE 10 Agronomic performance of parental accessions CS67 and Ames 1043. Accession Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5 Set 6 Set 7 Set 8 Set 9 Mean Grain yield (Lbs/ac) CS67 — 1580 — — — — — — — 1580 Ames 1043 1385 1710 1381 1736 1381 1796 1192 1744 1579 1545 Mean 1256 1602 1330 1389 1197 1695 926 1669 1480 1394 Oil yield (Lbs/ac) CS67 — 545 — — — — — — — 545 Ames 1043 512 606 483 — 492 643 — 686 631 579 Mean 465 560 464 — 414 618 — 649 579 535 Oil content (%) CS67 — 35.2 — — — — — — — 35.18 Ames 1043 37.50 36.2 34.97 — 34.25 36.40 — 39.14 39.65 36.88 Mean 36.90 35.75 34.89 — 33.84 36.21 — 38.64 38.63 36.41 Seed weight (g/1000) CS67 — 1.04 — — — — — — — 1.04 Ames 1043 1.16 1.09 1.12 1.10 1.17 1.30 0.86 1.25 1.39 1.16 Mean 1.04 0.99 1.10 0.95 1.08 1.19 0.74 1.15 1.33 1.06 Alpha-linolenic acid (%) CS67 — 32.0 — — — — — — — 31.99 Ames 1043 — 31.2 30.57 — — 33.99 — 35.28 — 32.75 Mean — 32.0 31.41 — — 34.47 — 36.48 — 33.59

A modified bulk-pedigree selection scheme was used for the development of SO-120 (Table 11). A cross between accession ‘CS67’ and accession ‘Ames 1043’ was made in a greenhouse in Bozeman, Mont. in the fall of 2006. During the spring of 2007, the seed of this hybrid was advanced to the F2 generation at a nursery in Bozeman, Mont., and in the winter of 2007/2008 seed of this F2 population was grown in a selection nursery in Yuma, Ariz. in duplicated plots (100 ft² each).

At maturity, an unrecorded number of individual plants were selected and harvested from this population. Selection focused on early maturity, medium plant height, increased branch and pod number, and good overall appearance. A sample of seed from each of these F3 families was collected and bulked, and during the spring season of 2008, this bulked seed was planted in a winter nursery in Bozeman, Mont. in duplicated plots (100 ft² each).

At maturity, 30 individual plants were selected and harvested from this population using the criteria described above and a random portion of seed from each plant was collected and bulked. During the winter season of 2008/2009, the bulked F4 seed from this population was planted in duplicated plots (100 ft² each) in a selection nursery in Yuma, Ariz.

At maturity, 20 individual plants were selected from this population using the same criteria as before. Seed from each of these individual F5 plants was planted in single rows in a nursery near Amsterdam, Mont. in the spring of 2009.

At maturity, one line was selected based on the same selection criteria stated before. Seed of the selected line, C09-BZ-SB6_1885_8 (SO-120), was purified and increased during the spring of 2010 in an isolated strip plot near Amsterdam, Mont.

TABLE 11 Breeding method used in development of SO-120. Generation Activity Season Location F1 Crosses Fall 2006 Bozeman, MT F2 Seed advance Spring 2007 Bozeman, MT F3 Sample of seed from each F2 plant bulked Winter 2007/2008 Yuma, AZ and planted in duplicated plots in a spring nursery. Single plant selections (unrecorded number of individual plants selected). Selection criteria included early maturity, short plant stature, increased branching, increased pod number, good overall appearance. F4 Sample of seed from each F3 line bulked Spring 2008 Bozeman, MT and planted in a winter nursery. Single plant selections (30 individual plants selected), selection criteria included early maturity, short stature, increased branching, increased pod number, overall good appearance. F5 Sample of seed from each F4 line bulked Winter 2008/2009 Yuma, AZ and planted in duplicated plots in a spring nursery. Single plant selections (20 individual plants selected), selection criteria included early maturity, short stature, increased branching, increased pod number, overall good appearance. F6 Sample of seed from selected individual Spring 2009 Amsterdam, MT plants from the F5 population planted in single-row plots in a nursery. Experimental line C09-BZ-SB6_1885_8 (S0-120) was selected. Selection criteria included early maturity, short plant stature, increased branching, increased pod number, good overall appearance. F7 Seed increase and seed purification in Spring 2010 Amsterdam, MT isolation field. F7 Multilocation yield evaluation trials. Spring 2010 Bozeman, MT; Seed oil quality evaluations. Carrington, ND; Dusty, WA, Havre, MT; Huntley, MT; Lingle, WY Pendleton, OR Saskatoon, SK, CAN F8 Multilocation yield evaluation trials. Spring 2011 Amsterdam, MT Seed oil quality evaluations. Carrington, ND; Havre, MT; F9 Multilocation yield evaluation trials. Spring 2019 Huntley, MT; Seed oil quality evaluations. Moccasin, MT; Pendleton, OR; Scottsbluff, NE.

All publications, patents, and patent publications cited are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety for all purposes. Also incorporated by reference herein are nucleic acid sequences and polypeptide sequences deposited into the GenBank, which are cited in this specification.

While the invention has been described in connection with specific embodiments thereof, it will be understood that it is capable of further modifications and this application is intended to cover any variations, uses, or adaptations of the invention following, in general, the principles of the invention and including such departures from the present disclosure as come within known or customary practice within the art to which the invention pertains and as may be applied to the essential features hereinbefore set forth and as follows in the scope of the appended claims.

REFERENCES

Anonymous. 2009. 14 Airlines sign landmark MOU for Camelina-based renewable jet fuel & green diesel, Dec. 15, 2009. Business Wire.

Berti, M. T. and A. A. Schneiter. 1993. Preliminary agronomic evaluation of new crops for North Dakota. p. 105-109. In: J. Janick and J. E. Simon (eds.), New crops. Wiley, New York.

Bouby, L. 1998. Two early finds of gold-of-pleasure (Camelina sp.) in middle Neolithic and Chacolithic sites in western France. Antiquity, 72: 391-398.

Brown et al. 1991. Tetrahedron, Vol. 47, Iss. 24, 3909-3914.

Budin, J. T., W. M. Breene and D. H. Putnam, 1995. Some compositional properties of Camelina (Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz) seeds and oils. Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society, 72: 309-315.

Eberhart, S. A., and W. A. Russell, 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop. Sci., 6: 36-40.

Finlay, K. W., and G. N. Wilkinson, 1963. The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. Aust. J. Agr. Res., 14: 742-754.

Gugel, R. K. and K. C. Falk. Agronomic and seed quality evaluation of Camelina sativa in western Canada. 2006. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 86:1047-1058.

Schultze-Motel, J., 1979. Die Anbaugeschichte des Leindotters, Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz.

Pavlista and Baltensperger, 2007, Phenology of Oilseed Crops for Bio-Diesel in the High Plains.

Pilgeram et al., 2007, Camelina sativa, A Montana Omega-3 and Fuel Crop, Issues in new crops and new use. InL J. Janick and A Whipkey (eds.). ASHS Press, Alexandria, Va.

Public Law 110-140. Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007.

Putnam, D. H., J. T. Budin, L. A. Field, and W. M. Breene. 1993. Camelina: A promising low-input oilseed. p. 314-322. In J. Janick, and J. E. Simon (eds), New Crops, Exploration, Research and Commercialization, John Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York, USA.

Robinson, R. G. 1987. Camelina: a useful research crop and a potential oilseed crop. University of Minnesota Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 579-1987 (Item No. AD-SB-3275), pp. 1-12.

Shonnard, D. R., L. Williams; and T. N. Kalnesc. 2010. Camelina-Derived Jet Fuel and Diesel: Sustainable Advanced Biofuels. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 29:382-392.

Vollmann, A. Damboeck, A. Eckl, H. Schrems, and P. Ruckenbauer. 1996. Improvement of Camelina sativa, an underexploited oilseed. p. 357-362. In: J. Janick (ed.), Progress in new crops. ASHS Press, Alexandria, Va. 

We claim:
 1. A seed of Camelina sativa (L.) variety designated “SO-120,” wherein a representative sample of seed of said variety has been deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-126940.
 2. A Camelina sativa (L.) plant, or a part thereof, produced by growing the seed of claim
 1. 3. A Camelina sativa (L.) plant, or a part thereof, having the physiological and morphological characteristics of Camelina sativa (L.) variety “SO-120,” wherein a representative sample of seed of said variety as been deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-126940.
 4. A tissue culture of regenerable cells produced from the plant or plant part of claim
 2. 5. The tissue culture of claim 4, wherein said cells of the tissue culture are produced from a plant part selected from the group consisting of embryos, meristematic cells, leaves, pollen, root, root tips, stems, anther, pistils, pods, flowers and seeds.
 6. A Camelina sativa (L.) plant regenerated from the tissue culture of claim 5, said plant having the morphological and physiological characteristics of Camelina sativa (L.) variety “SO-120,” wherein a representative sample of seed hass been deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-126940.
 7. A method for producing a Camelina seed comprising crossing a first parent Camelina plant with a second parent Camelina plant and harvesting the resultant hybrid bean seed, wherein said first parent Camelina plant or second parent Camelina plant is the Camelina sativa (L.) plant of claim
 2. 8. A hybrid Camelina seed produced by the method of claim
 7. 9. A method for producing an herbicide-resistant Camelina plant comprising transforming the Camelina saliva (L.) plant of claim 2 with a transgene that confers herbicide resistance to an herbicide selected from the group consisting of imidazolinone, sulfonylurea, glyphosate, glufosinate, L-phosphinothricin, triazine, and benzonitrile.
 10. An herbicide resistant Camelina plant, or a part thereof, produced by the method of claim
 9. 11. A method for producing an insect resistant Camelina plant comprising transforming the Camelina saliva (L.) plant of claim 2 with a transgene that confers insect resistance.
 12. An insect resistant Camelina plant, or a part thereof, produced by the method of claim
 11. 13. A method for producing a disease resistant Camelina plant comprising transforming the Camelina sativa (L.) plant of claim 2 with a transgene that confers disease resistance.
 14. A disease resistant Camelina plant, or a part thereof, produced by the method of claim
 13. 15. A method of introducing a desired trait into Camelina sativa (L.) variety “SO-120” comprising: (a) crossing a Camelina saliva (L.) variety “SO-120” plant grown from Camelina saliva (L.) variety “SO-120” seed, wherein a representative sample of seed has been deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-126940, with another Camelina plant that comprises a desired trait to produce F1 progeny plants; (b) selecting one or more progeny plants that have the desired trait to produce selected progeny plants; (c) crossing the selected progeny plants with the Camelina saliva (L.) variety “SO-120” plants to produce backcross progeny plants; (d) selecting for backcross progeny plants that have the desired trait and physiological and morphological characteristics of Camelina saliva (L.) variety “SO-120” to produce selected backcross progeny plants; and (e) repeating steps (c) and (d) three or more times in succession to produce selected fourth or higher backcross progeny plants that comprise the desired trait and the physiological and morphological characteristics of Camelina saliva (L.) variety “SO-120.”
 16. A Camelina plant produced by the method of claim 15, wherein the plant has the desired trait and the physiological and morphological characteristics of Camelina saliva (L.) variety “SO-120.”
 17. A method for producing Camelina saliva (L.) variety “SO-120” seed comprising crossing a first parent Camelina saliva (L.) plant with a second parent Camelina saliva (L.) plant and harvesting the resultant Camelina saliva (L.) seed, wherein both said first and second Camelina saliva (L.) plants are the Camelina saliva (L.) plant of claim
 4. 18. The Camelina plant of claim 16, wherein the desired trait is herbicide resistance and the resistance is conferred to an herbicide selected from the group consisting of imidazolinone, sulfonylurea, glyphosate, glufosinate, L-phosphinothricin, triazine, and benzonitrile.
 19. The Camelina plant of claim 16, wherein the desired trait is insect resistance and the insect resistance is conferred by a transgene encoding a Bacillus thuringiensis endotoxin.
 20. The Camelina plant of claim 16, wherein the desired trait is selected from the group consisting of insect resistance, disease resistance, water stress tolerance, heat tolerance, improved shelf life, and improved nutritional quality. 